The Silent Revolution in the Clinic: A Comprehensive Review of AI Medical Scribes and Clinical Documentation Automation

Authors

  • Abdulhakeem Bolaji Bello Author
  • Daniel Adepoju University of Medical Sciences, Ondo image/svg+xml Author
  • Fatumbi Daniel Tumise Author
  • Eluyera Samuel Author
  • Abdulaziz Muhammad Salim Author
  • Quadri Oluwatobi Olawoye Author
  • Muhammad Bashir Yahya University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust image/svg+xml Author
  • Muhammad M Abdulaziz West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust image/svg+xml Author
  • Taslim Owolarafe Author

Keywords:

AI medical scribe, clinical documentation automation, ambient intelligence, clinician burnout, electronic health records

Abstract

Background: Clinician burnout has reached crisis levels, primarily driven by the administrative burden of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) - the digital systems where doctors store patient information. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Medical Scribes and Clinical Documentation Automation (CDA) have emerged as promising solutions to this problem. These are computer programs that "listen" to doctor-patient conversations and automatically create medical notes.
Method: This narrative review synthesises findings from systematic reviews, real-world studies, and technical reports published predominantly between 2024-2025. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, with the last search performed in June 2025. The review examines the technical architecture, clinical impact, challenges, and ethical considerations of AI scribe technology.
Findings: The evidence consistently demonstrates that AI scribes significantly reduce documentation time, with one study showing savings of approximately 0.57 minutes per note - translating to about 7 minutes less paperwork per physician per day in that specific study context. Clinician satisfaction improves markedly when these tools are implemented, and patient-physician interaction quality increases as physicians can focus more on patients rather than screens.
Conclusion: While AI scribes show potential for reducing administrative burden and restoring patient-centred care, their successful integration depends on addressing critical challenges including accuracy variability, algorithmic bias, data privacy concerns, and the need for robust regulatory frameworks. The physician must always remain responsible for final verification of AI-generated notes. Further research in diverse clinical settings, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, is essential.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Daniel Adepoju, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo

    Department of Health Information Management, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo

  • Abdulaziz Muhammad Salim

    Department of Family Medicine, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Osun State

  • Quadri Oluwatobi Olawoye

    Flinders University

  • Muhammad Bashir Yahya, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

    University Hospitals Birmingham

  • Muhammad M Abdulaziz, West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust

    West Midlands,  UK

  • Taslim Owolarafe

    Department of Civil Engineering, Obafemi Awolowo University, Osun State

References

Published

30-10-2025

How to Cite

The Silent Revolution in the Clinic: A Comprehensive Review of AI Medical Scribes and Clinical Documentation Automation. (2025). Nigerian Frontline Medicine Journal, 3(2), 83-88. https://nfmjournal.org/nfmj/article/view/115

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 34

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.